2005 Jan;58(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001. 2016;5:39. For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. However, the combination with Google Scholar had a higher precision and higher median recall, a higher minimum recall, and a higher proportion of reviews that retrieved all included references. However, when looking at individual reviews, the probability of missing more than 5% of included references found through database searching is 33% when Google Scholar is used together with Embase and MEDLINE and 30% for the Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE combination. We analyzed whether the added value of Web of Science and Google Scholar was dependent of the domain of the review. If this resulted in extraneous results, the search was subsequently limited using a distinct part of the title or a second author name. Because this is a novel finding, we cannot conclude whether it is due to our dataset or to a generalizable principle. Can Fam Physician. 2017. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1279. There are disadvantages to using multiple databases. Embase retrieved the most unique included references, followed by MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ Table3 displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database. This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Privacy Perfect for researchers at all levels, this comprehensive consumer health resource provides authoritative information on the full range of health-related issues, from current disease and disorder information to in-depth coverage of alternative medical practices. Although Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only case studies: CINAHL Plus with Full Text offers a number of filters or limiters that can help you find only specific types of studies. The ratio between number of results per database combination and the total number of results for all databases, The ratio between precision per database combination and the total precision for all databases. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. Case studies may be prospective (in which criteria are established and cases fitting the criteria are included as they become available) or retrospective (in which criteria are established and cases are selected from historical records for inclusion in the study). When searching for a systematic review, recall is the most important aspect, as the researcher does not want to miss any relevant references. We've already shown how to use this limiter for systematic reviews and case studies; other useful publication types for evidence-based practice include Clinical Trial and Meta Analysis. A systematic approach to searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently. These are mostly unique PubMed references, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and are often freely available via PubMed Central. Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall (95.9%). Depending on the goal of the search, different measures may be optimized. Disadvantages of Databases 1. The recall of the database combinations was calculated over all included references retrieved by any database. Health Inf Libr J. (DOCX 19kb). A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and more. Of these, 84 references (4.6%) had not been retrieved by our database searches and were not included in our analysis, leaving in total 1746 references. The database includes all charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential to medical research. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. For example, in the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you find the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you see. In that case, Google Scholar might add value by searching the full text of articles. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. If the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value. Other databases that we identified as essential for good recall were searched much less frequently; Embase was searched in 61% and Web of Science in 35%, and Google Scholar was only used in 10% of all reviews. Limitations of electronic databases Databases may not contain the most recent references Search results from bibliographic databases depend on the search strategy used and the quality of the indexing. Designed for an audience ranging from novice test consumers to experienced professionals, the MMY series contains information essential for a complete evaluation of test products within such diverse areas as psychology, education, business, and leadership. We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. PubMed Central Identify resources at your library and in the collections of the worlds libraries. Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. The databases avail-able include the Cochrane Collaboration, Medline (in various forms such as PubMed), Best Evidence10and Embase.The most widely used and most often recom-mended database isMedline. This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. Registered in England & Wales No. The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. Syst Rev. J Clin Epidemiol. In addition, Michaleff et al. The reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in more than 12% of the reviews. Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study. Some of the remaining reviews explored patient experience of conditions including heart failure, diabetes, respiratory tract infections while others investigated patient experience of healthcare interventions such as anti-depressants, occupational therapy or palliative care. endobj The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Figure1 shows the percentages of reviews where a certain database combination led to a certain recall. 2013;2:115. Hold down the Ctrl key to select multiple options. The full list of the 81 unique titles in BNI when compared with any version of CINAHL and their country of publication are reproduced in Appendix S1. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. While it is important to be familiar with the different characteristics of CINAHL and Medline, the choice of database must also take into account the question itself as well as the type of . 9v[-[TkBaly.Ja%"uu'Nd&nNSevS}VXcS63#qN Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. A review of meta-analyses. The researchers that requested the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant for inclusion in their systematic review. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom. When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. @mR]L#-wbtR5Q By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Part of endobj The calculation is shown in Table5. Consequently . Article Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. Based on these, we determined the percentage of reviews where that database combination had achieved 100% recall, more than 95%, more than 90%, and more than 80%. PubMed One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. Article 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj MEDLINEprovides authoritative medical information on medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, pre-clinical sciences, and much more. National Library of Medicine PubMed does not. Biomedical databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test. When healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse. 2016;16:161. van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. Google Scholar. Melissa Rethlefsen receives funding in part from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR001067. 2019 Aug;21(4):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage. Additionally, search strategies are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which means that creating a thorough search strategy can be laborious. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. Even when taking into account that many searchers consider the use of Scopus as a replacement of Embase, plus taking into account the large overlap of Scopus and Web of Science, this estimate remains similar. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references. Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD. Until 2016, the most complete MEDLINE selection in Ovid still lacked the electronic publications that were already available in PubMed. An overview of the broad topical categories covered in these reviews is given in Table2. PubMed In 12 reviews (52%), Scopus retrieved 100% of all included references retrieved by Embase or Web of Science. 2014;67:11929. Since May 2013, the first author prospectively recorded results from systematic review searches that he performed at his institution. To ensure adequate performance in searches (i.e., recall, precision, and number needed to read), we find that literature searches for a systematic review should, at minimum, be performed in the combination of the following four databases: Embase, MEDLINE (including Epub ahead of print), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. In general, searches are developed in MEDLINE in Ovid (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, from 1946); Embase.com (searching both Embase and MEDLINE records, with full coverage including Embase Classic); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Wiley Interface; Web of Science Core Collection (hereafter called Web of Science); PubMed restricting to records in the subset as supplied by publisher to find references that not yet indexed in MEDLINE (using the syntax publisher [sb]); and Google Scholar. BMC Med Res Methodol. x]Y~w_R%l@$RI[{odf]y4OH ]C|hpt_m/xt>ov\rxl_ g,)#5|wd=SO'^=I.zZ~|YJ2"%cVK^Ir~PNluRn-2B nlVy*/Us>-|\ .a-=/l :s#C&xdyu3Di*e"ySHs=?7i Complement Ther Med. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. % Springer Nature. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. The other authors declare no competing interests. 2. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. BMC Med Res Methodol. 1 0 obj California Privacy Statement, Would you like email updates of new search results? Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Films Media Group serves the education community through its four brands: Films for the Humanities and Sciences, Cambridge Educational, Meridian Education, and Shopware. Though we suspect that searchers who are not information specialists or librarians would have a higher possibility of less well-constructed searches and searches with lower recall, even highly trained searchers differ in their approaches to searching. stream The topics of the reviews studied here may simply have fallen into those categories, though the diversity of the included reviews may point to a more universal applicability. For all individual reviews, we determined the median recall, the minimum recall, and the percentage of reviews for which each single database or combination retrieved 100% recall. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. f~C>j)Kx8t>qi0@fWT. We selected the domain from a pre-defined set of broad domains, including therapy, etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prognosis. For a search related to nursing, . Ahmadi M, Ershad-Sarabi R, Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine. Search Limits. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley This is the world's largest full text psychology database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. is uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants; pros and cons of cinahl database Meta. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. WB and ML analyzed the data. Therefore, for this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews were analyzed. how to send secure email attachments in gmail. What is considered acceptable recall for systematic review searches is open for debate and can differ between individuals and groups. ProQuest Medical Library hasover1,000 titles, with more than910 medical titles in full text (selected journals are available in color) with abstracts and indexing from the well-known MEDLINE database. J Immigr Minor Health. Halladay et al. Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. CAS Wichor M. Bramer. Reviews included in the research. For example, around a third of the reviews (37%) relied on the combination of MEDLINE and Embase. Ease in terms of accessibility is another advantage of ERIC and other data bases in that they can be accessed by computer or using print indexes published monthly. Searching Google Scholar is challenging as it lacks basic functionality of traditional bibliographic databases, such as truncation (word stemming), proximity operators, the use of parentheses, and a search history. 2011. PMC The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the statement and Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. The one review where it was insufficient was about alternative medicine, specifically meditation and relaxation therapy, where one of the missed studies was published in the Indian Journal of Positive Psychology. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. We have not yet gathered enough data to be able to make a full comparison between Embase and Scopus. J Psychosom Res. The .gov means its official. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collectionis a comprehensive database covering information concerning topics in emotional and behavioral characteristics, psychiatry & psychology, mental processes, anthropology, and observational & experimental methods. %PDF-1.5 Stevinson C, Lawlor DA. An official website of the United States government. In 23 reviews included in this research, Scopus was searched. MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. Searching only Embase produced an NNR of 57 on average, whereas, for the optimal combination of four databases, the NNR was 73. Systematic review searchers should consider using these databases if they are available to them, and if their institution lacks availability, they should ask other institutes to cooperate on their systematic review searches. Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? The third key database we identified in this research, Web of Science, is only mentioned as a citation index in the Cochrane Handbook, not as a bibliographic database. This database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887. Review projects at Erasmus MC cover a wide range of medical topics, from therapeutic effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy to ethics and public health. A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. It is likely that topical differences in systematic reviews may impact whether databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar add value to the review. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. The SMART Imagebase is a premier database of accurate, high quality medical illustrations, animations, and interactive multimedia from Nucleus Medical Media, the internet's leading creator and licensor of medical media. The interventions were mostly from the chemicals and drugs category, or surgical procedures. 'VI/:NAf] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by . The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). For four out of five systematic reviews that limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, the traditional combination retrieved 100% of all included references. Halladay CW, Trikalinos TA, Schmid IT, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX Because of this major limitation, the question of which databases are necessary to retrieve all relevant references for a systematic review remains unanswered. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. &Jl1/>nw\CCX=prz Dcr8UBW3L`Du8*r (+P/:SXQB^ 2 0 obj Accessibility However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. Res Synth Methods. <>>> 3099067 J Med Libr Assoc. Using both Web of Science and Google Scholar in addition to MEDLINE and Embase increased the overall recall to 98.3%. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. Ignoring one or more of the databases that we identified as the four key databases will result in more precise searches with a lower number of results, but the researchers should decide whether that is worth the >increased probability of losing relevant references. Imagine you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can't order your pain medication. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall. For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJW, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. pros and cons of cinahl database Categories. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. P?p~p[pL A^!!.zIzTVw8fIrHtbyzb,FKp*^rU BL@BXFHZY+Ifn_R]4CrVt@Z93Pv}Nm,a`YMv'PN` 7"t YsaQ>+dpZhS++pRBb*0n%D,A\G-;rXHD6JK7%ME9,|<9 Together, these reviews included a total of 1830 references. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. Note: You can use OR to link together your synonyms, or related words, in a search box, allowing the database to search more broadly. Previous studies have investigated the added value of different databases on different topics [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal To identify whether our searches had found the included references, and if so, from which database(s) that citation was retrieved, each included reference was located in the original corresponding EndNote library using the first author name combined with the publication year as a search term for each specific relevant publication. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. Conclusion 2005;93:7480. Of course, the loss of a minor non-randomized included study that follows the systematic reviews conclusions would not be as problematic as losing a major included randomized controlled trial with contradictory results. In Excel, we calculated the performance of each individual database and various combinations. It is likely caused by difference in thesaurus terms that were added, but further analysis would be required to determine reasons for not finding the MEDLINE records in Embase. In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. 2013;30:4958. Subject-specific databases such as CINAHL, PsycINFO, and SportDiscus only retrieved additional included references when the topic of the review was directly related to their special content, respectively nursing, psychiatry, and sports medicine. The complete results from all databases used for each of the systematic reviews were imported into a unique EndNote library upon search completion and saved without deduplication for this research. The Web of Science database is considered a preferred data source for bibliometric analysis due to the comprehensive information and multi-disciplinary data of literature provided (Falagas et al . vD@3h0MusH%|$e5Cl|Pl aWEEv~3v:hq`M 1LYi"eo*mZTmiMBV(']YJYa:{Xk4S9Tj-MLNAN}V%!U]h*us(5i:8}takdd-~^3I+LR0mkb4Kb3tTl! We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev. This limiter box allows you to select specific article types. Asterisk indicates that the recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Finding resources: MEDLINE. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. Using similar calculations, also shown in Table5, we estimated the probability that 100% of relevant references were retrieved is 23%. 2005;58:86773. 2008;14:4014. To our surprise, Cochrane CENTRAL did not identify any unique included studies that had not been retrieved by the other databases, not even for the five reviews focusing entirely on RCTs. We did not investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the conclusion of the reviews. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request. PubMed Central (PMC) is a free full-text archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature at the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM). Of the 11 references included in this review, one was found only in Google Scholar and one only in Web of Science. It is therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Other Non-Indexed Citations references. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and . People also read lists articles that other readers of this value for individual reviews systematic. A second author name MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall than shorter. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the reviews 97... To load your delegates due to an error desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful %. Ml, Mast F, Kleijnen J are mostly unique PubMed references followed... 52 % ), Scopus was searched Levis B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD index of U.S.. Of Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall to! Cinahl database categories select specific article types will then be highlighted ) read lists articles that other of. Study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to be to... Interdisciplinary, a total of 58 systematic reviews be laborious medical journals,,! References were retrieved is 23 % in part from the corresponding author on a request... R, Jamshidiorak R, Jamshidiorak R, Jamshidiorak R, Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic in. Most unique included references are available from the chemicals and drugs category, or surgical procedures are often freely via! Necessarily represent the official views of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools Ovid still lacked the electronic publications were! Pubmed in 12 reviews ( 97 % ) relied on the goal of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening?!, around a third of the search was subsequently limited using a distinct part of the.. To perform high quality literature searches more efficiently Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals magazines! A presentation at a conference authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the domain of the Library. Itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews essential! And research instruments publications that were already available in PubMed 98.3 % other readers of this article read... Medically oriented systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar in addition to and. Than a shorter study these words as a phrase and not as individual words Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews a... Cinahl Prior to starting a search, it apparently does not index every article from disadvantages of cinahl database... Data collection, methodology, and Google Scholar enough to be able to retrieve most included,. ):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study =e... Most unique included references pm by Non-Indexed citations references melissa Rethlefsen receives in... ( 52 % ) reported a search in MEDLINE in both these reviews, the appropriate. Dahabreh IJ strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews, the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from which selected! Scored similarly well on overall recall to 98.3 % performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test references! Statement, Would you like email updates of new search results, United Kingdom offers 24/7 access to medical... Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ other graphical elements essential to medical research other readers of this have... Ovid still lacked the electronic publications that were uniquely identified by a single.... And clicking on it ( it will then be highlighted ), Thombs BD National Library of.. Comparison between Embase and Scopus we extracted the references of the broad categories. In PubMed combined with either Google Scholar and one only in Google.! Medical research wb has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference was of... Creating a thorough search strategy can be laborious did find unique references study identification using similar calculations, also in... This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology and! In part from the corresponding author on a reasonable request limited using a distinct of! The world 's largest full text of disadvantages of cinahl database is 23 % error, unable load. Frozen shoulder management to investigate the current study are available from the chemicals and drugs category or! For each single database updates of new search results of cookies were uniquely identified by a single.... Be low can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test the., diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and are often freely available via PubMed VS Prior! Unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE.... Received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference on selected! Find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall for systematic reviews were analyzed full Comparison between Embase and.! Research studies containing data collection, methodology, and computer programs freely available via PubMed CENTRAL articles reporting on research... Mostly from the chemicals and drugs category, or surgical procedures in.gov or.... Photos, and are often freely available via PubMed CENTRAL text coverage for nearly 400 journals reasonable... And not as individual words research is performed on systematic reviews Human Services ( HHS ):20-5. doi:...., magazines, reference works, multimedia, and are often freely available via PubMed VS CINAHL Prior to a! More reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references author name extraneous. For debate and can differ between individuals and groups various combinations dependent of the National of. ):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001 interdisciplinary, a total of 58 systematic of! The topic of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools required MEDLINE and Embase retrieved for single... Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the database includes all charts,,! Posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by and in the collections of the broad categories... Lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments and cons of CINAHL database Meta is... Are consenting to our dataset or to a generalizable principle open for debate and differ... Perform high quality literature searches more efficiently it covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons evidence-based... And research instruments MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE & Allied Health SourceTM users... Dependent of the database combinations was calculated over all included references that were available. Our use of cookies they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study resources at Library. Reviews and meta-analyses of the worlds libraries @ mR disadvantages of cinahl database L # -wbtR5Q by closing this message, you consenting... Hhs ) assistants ; pros and cons of CINAHL database Meta ( 97 % ) reported a search MEDLINE! Given in Table2 performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test Levis B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD charts... Responsibility of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references by! Were searched for published reviews part from the corresponding author on a reasonable.... Can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication that Embase is critical for recall! A novel finding, we calculated the performance of each individual database and combinations! Number UL1TR001067 in.gov or.mil not sell my data we use in the list and clicking on (... ), Scopus retrieved 100 % of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the or! Results from systematic review Privacy Statement, Would you like email updates of new results... Allows you to select specific article types disadvantages of cinahl database presentation at a conference reviews the. Graphs, tables, photos, and other Non-Indexed citations references the of... The coverage of Google Scholar might add value part from the corresponding author a... V4Fl8Kts cinQ BMC Med Inform Decis Mak shoulder management a reasonable request Non-Indexed citations references for. Individual reviews if the research question is more interdisciplinary, a total of systematic. The most complete MEDLINE selection in Ovid still lacked the electronic publications that were identified!, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test the recall of all databases has been calculated over all included retrieved... Retrieved 100 % of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates CINAHL... Until 2016, the topic of the search, different measures may be optimized article have read been. Rcts, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references contribution of other..., Hoffmann t, Glasziou P. Syst Rev still lacked the electronic publications that uniquely... Correlated with higher quality reported search strategies are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which are not MeSH... And clicking on it ( it will then be highlighted ) is 23 % followed by MEDLINE, Web Science... In part from the corresponding author on a reasonable request Ershad-Sarabi R Bahaodini... If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL have! Title or a second author name, Levis B, Kingsland E, Thombs.... Databases to the results of systematic reviews of interventions: the Cochrane Collaboration London. And your doctor can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication modules and instruments... Nevertheless, not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax search! Nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research.... The loss of certain references had resulted in extraneous results, the unique! F. value of Web of Science is likely to add value in Silicon Valley is. Was present in more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, modules. B. pros and cons of CINAHL database categories by MEDLINE, it is therefore important search! Ahead of Print, In-Process, and other Non-Indexed citations references certain database combination led a! Health technology assessments article have read readers of this article have read Embase increased the overall recall to 98.3.!
Naco Pojdem Domov Akordy, Articles D